Crixet vs Overleaf vs Octree — AI Features Compared
Date Published
AI in LaTeX Editing: A 2025 Comparison
AI is transforming how we write research papers. But not all "AI features" are created equal. Let's compare what Crixet, Overleaf, and Octree actually offer.
Overleaf's AI Features
What they offer:
• Basic autocomplete
• Error detection (via logs)
• Grammarly integration (premium)
Limitations:
• No autonomous editing
• Can't fix errors automatically
• AI feels bolted-on, not integrated
Crixet's AI Features
What they offer:
• Equation assistance
• Some writing suggestions
• Template recommendations
Limitations:
• Limited LaTeX-specific understanding
• No multi-file awareness
• Inconsistent results
Octree's AI Features
What we offer:
• Autonomous AI editing: Select text, describe changes, AI executes
• One-click error fixes: Undefined control sequence? Fixed instantly
• Context-aware suggestions: AI understands your entire project
• TikZ diagram generation: Describe it, we draw it
• Image-to-LaTeX: Drop an image, get the code
Key difference: Octree's AI doesn't just suggest — it does. When you ask "make this equation inline," the AI directly edits your document with preview before applying.
Real-World Example
The task: Fix a "Missing $ inserted" error
Overleaf: Shows error in log. You hunt through your document to find the issue.
Crixet: Highlights the line. You still fix it manually.
Octree: Click "Fix" → AI identifies the issue → Proposes the fix → You approve → Done.
The Verdict
Overleaf and Crixet added AI as a feature. Octree was built with AI at the core. For researchers who want AI that actually accelerates their workflow, the difference is night and day.
Experience real AI-powered LaTeX editing. Try Octree free at https://useoctree.com